Luke Cowan-Dickie made his much-anticipated return to the England lineup after years plagued by injuries, but it didn’t take long for his tackling style to come under fire.
RUCK’s Autumn Nations Series coverage is proudly powered by the My Name’5 Doddie Foundation, dedicated to creating a world free of MND. Join the the fight against MND here.
A Reliable Force
Before his setbacks, Cowan-Dickie was a stalwart in England’s pack, known for his hard-hitting physicality and tireless work rate around the field. But there’s one particular aspect of his game that’s always left the rugby world divided: his trademark low tackles.
The Low Hit Debate
Rugby players are trained to go low in tackles, aiming for the waist or just below to bring down ball carriers. However, Cowan-Dickie’s style has raised eyebrows, as he frequently targets opponents’ shins and ankles. Critics argue that these hits resemble dangerous, diving shots that have been outlawed in other sports, like the NFL, to prevent serious injuries.
The Fans Speak Out
Even after a long hiatus from the international scene, Cowan-Dickie’s tackling method didn’t escape scrutiny. The reaction on social media was swift and critical:
- One fan noted, “Luke Cowan-Dickie commits at least 3 no arms tackles in every game and Ben Earl managed to fit his standard 1 in right at the end there. All went unpunished today.”
- Another criticized, “Typical no arms tackle from Luke Cowan-Dickie. Officials ignore it.”
- A third comment highlighted the danger, “See Cowan-Dickie still hasn’t learned how to tackle. He constantly puts himself, and others, in danger.”
Whether officials take stricter action or not, it’s clear the debate around Cowan-Dickie’s tackling technique isn’t going away anytime soon.
6 England Players Who Completely Flopped Against the Wallabies
With back-to-back losses to the All Blacks and now the Wallabies, England have now lost six out of 10 games this season. Their current form, which includes four straight defeats, marks their worst run since 2018.
Ben Earl
Earl hasn’t managed to recapture his stellar Six Nations form, as the Telegraph notes. While he put in work defensively and carried well, he didn’t have the same dominating impact. Planet Rugby praised his relentless work ethic but pointed out his difficulty in making decisive offensive breaks against Australia’s defense.
Telegraph 5/10: “Form still not quite at the levels it was during the Six Nations. Made his share tackles and carries but not dominating like he once did.”
Planet Rugby 6/10: “Work ethic outstanding yet again but struggled to punch holes in the Australian rearguard.”
George Furbank
Furbank’s performance lacked impact, with critics noting his quiet presence on the field. He didn’t make the anticipated contributions in attack and failed to shut down Australia’s two first-half tries in the same corner. Planet Rugby highlighted his overplaying, which led to errors and turnovers. He was replaced by George Ford, with Marcus Smith moving to full-back, after 18 minutes.
Mail Online 4.5/10: “Quiet. Didn’t necessarily do much wrong, but didn’t stand out either. Replaced by George Ford with Marcus Smith moving to full-back.”
Rugby Pass 4.5/10: “Didn’t feature in attack as was hoped and it was disappointing that he didn’t better shut the door defensively for Australia’s two first half tries scored in the same corner. Sacrificed with 18 minutes remaining, with Smith switching to full-back.”
Planet Rugby 4/10: ” Was rightly heralded in July but Furbank was very poor on Saturday. Overplayed on far too many occasions, which subsequently led to errors and turnovers.”
Henry Slade
Slade, as the backline’s defensive captain, took heavy criticism for Australia’s success in navigating the blitz defense. While Rugby Pass mentioned the defensive responsibilities shifting to Joe El-Abd, Slade was expected to be the top defensive presence and fell short.
Telegraph 4/10: “As the defensive captain of the backline needs to bear responsibility for how easily Australia navigated the blitz.”
Rugby Pass 6/10: “Struggled in a defensive set-up that is now the remit of Joe El-Abd. Needed to be his team’s best defending back but was unable to provide that reliability.”
Mail Online 5/10: “He is the man in charge of England’s blitz defence, but it was cut to ribbons far too often by some razor-sharp Australian attack.”
Tommy Freeman
Freeman couldn’t find the prominence he desired, drawing comparisons to the standout performances of others, such as his Northampton teammate Sleightholme. Both the Express and Telegraph highlighted the limits of his contributions in England’s current game plan, while Rugby Pass emphasised his lack of improvement from prior matches.
Express 5/10: “Again not as prominent as he would wish, will be envious of two-try club mate Sleightholme.”
Telegraph 5/10: “There is so much more to his game than just chasing high balls but you wouldn’t know it the way England use him.”
Rugby Pass 5/10: “Needed an upgrade after his slow going effort versus New Zealand, but it didn’t really happen.
Mail Online 4.5/10: “Unfortunately, he looked a touch off the pace. Never stopped working but had a good chance for first-half try.”
Ben Spencer
Struggled to convince in the scrum-half role, even with accurate box kicks early on. Spencer showed some attacking flair, but his momentum dwindled, with the Telegraph highlighting some scragged runs and Rugby Pass pointing to missed defensive moments.
Telegraph 5/10: “Still not convincing in the No 9 shirt. Box kicking was generally on the money but got scragged a couple of times around the ruck.”
Rugby Pass 5.5/10: “Showed attacking skills early on; look at his pass off the floor to the supporting Freeman. But his display them got bogged down, something not helped by his early second-half box-kicking and not doing enough to tackle the try-scoring Williams into touch. Exited on 62.”
Mail Online 5/10: “He looked like he’d done enough to stop Australian lock Jeremy Williams from scoring, but the try was given.”
George Martin
Martin’s early carry attempt failed to result in points, setting a tough tone. Criticized for not imposing himself enough, he was noted as England’s leading tackler but struggled to handle the speed of the game. His slow reaction to McDermott’s try was a particular sticking point.
Evening Standard 5/10: “Should have scored early on when trying to carry over the whitewash from a few yards out.”
Guardian 6/10: “Another who is not quite making the kind of impact we know he can. Went off gingerly midway through second half.”
Mail Online 5/10: “Not his usual self. Australia’s high-tempo game didn’t allow him to get close to gold shirts and make the sort of tackles he normally does.”
Express 5/10: “Showed well early but England need more from their enforcer to arrest this slump.”
Telegraph 5/10: “A fast paced, end-to-end contest is categorically not his best environment. Was England’s top tackler before he went off but was too slow to react to McDermott’s snipe.”
