"Belly tackle" - World Rugby to propose controversial law change

A belly tackle is a type of tackle made below the sternum, or mid-chest. The trial will be opt-in and subject to approval by the World Rugby Council.

World Rugby is encouraging member nations to participate in the trial, as evidence shows that taking no action to address head-on-head contact is not an acceptable solution.

Alan Gilpin, World Rugby's chief executive, emphasized that the trial presents an opportunity to both promote the growth of the sport at the community level and reduce player risk.

He said: "The clear mounting evidence is that doing nothing is simply not an option," World Rugby's chief executive Alan Gilpin said.

"Specifically in the community game, head-on-head contact is something we need to reduce. 

"We have to view these proposals as an opportunity to grow the sport at community level in tandem with reducing player risk."

Owens, who hung up his whistle two years ago, has come up with five possible changes to encourage expansive rugby.

Owens wrote: "As for goal-line dropouts, I was a big fan initially because I felt it would prevent attacking teams from numerous pick-and-gos near the try line, with teams instead attempting to move the ball wide to avoid being held up and losing possession.

" But I'm not sure it has worked as planned. We still see plenty of pick-and-gos until teams get over, we still see plenty of mauls and the number of collisions hasn't decreased.

"We are also seeing fewer scrums near the goal line, and to be honest I'm not sure that is a good thing. The scrum needs to be an important part of the game, and right now we are not seeing the benefits of it. Rugby must continue to be a game for all shapes and sizes, and at all levels, too.

Attacking teams are also kicking longer knowing that if the ball rolls dead, the defending team has to do a goal-line dropout and they can get the ball back.

"We've also lost the short dropouts we used to see from the 22-metre line where teams would compete to win the ball back, or a quick dropout would be taken, because teams now backed up on their goal line just kick the ball long to escape and what happens? The opposition kick it back.

"From initially believing it would work, I would now like the goal-line dropout law to go to be honest. If anything it is having a negative effect."

Owens wrote: "When people say the caterpillar ruck is boring I agree for sure. We need to referee the 'use it' and five seconds law much better.

"I would even go as far and change the law to 'use it' after three seconds. The referee must call for the ball to be used when it is available, not wait for it to be halfway up the caterpillar ruck and then call it."

Owens wrote: "We should aim for good performances that facilitate good games. In my opinion, perfect has become the enemy of the good because people are striving for a standard that is unachievable. A frustrating over-reliance on the TMO is one result of this fear of getting things wrong.

"Pressure is being exerted on referees by spectators, social media users, coaches, players, performance reviewers and referee managers. That is a lot of people scrutinising everything. I think we need to take a step back and make sure we pick up the things that matter."

Owens, who would like to see the number of replacements reduced from eight to four our five, previously said: "This is something I have been saying for a long time.

"Every question and answer session I do I am always asked which law I would like to change and I always say I would like to see the substitution law changed.

"We as referees and referee managers in World Rugby, we're always looking at things that need to be applied firmer, which contributes to the safety of the game and that is an ongoing process

"It is a physical game and unless you change it beyond total recognition of what the sport is, you are going to have to accept that there is going to be a risk of injury, but a minimal risk if you compare it to people that are injured everyday in walking about doing nothing."

Owens wrote in his column for The Telegraph during the Lions series: "Some of the scrum-feeds from both sides - particularly in the second half by Cobus Reinach - were beyond a joke.

"I must say that I have been as guilty of not giving enough free-kicks for crooked feeds as any referee, but it has to be stopped as soon as possible now. Scrum-halves simply have to put the ball into scrums in an acceptable manner.

"Everyone you speak to about it wants feeds to be straight. Brian Moore has been making the point for years and I agree with him. Everyone comments on it, and there is no excuse. It has been allowed to creep in, after a brief crackdown a couple of years ago."