Nigel Owens explains why he’s been ‘silenced’ by World Rugby

Friday, 07 November 2025 at 12:50

byRugby Rucker

, and it’s changing the contest. There’s chaos, competition — and a lot of penalties. Forty-one in six rounds, to be exact.

Former Test referee Nigel Owens has revealed the reason he did not comment on Tadhg Beirne’s red card following Ireland’s clash with New Zealand.

Join RUCK’s Instagram broadcast channel and get the latest rugby news straight to your phone.

The Munster lock was initially shown a yellow card for head contact with Beauden Barrett, which was later upgraded to a 20-minute red by the Foul Play Review Officer.

However, Beirne was cleared of any wrongdoing after an independent disciplinary panel rescinded the red card, leaving him free to play in Ireland’s remaining Autumn fixtures against Japan, Australia, and South Africa.

Owens explains the decision

Speaking on

World Rugby’s Whistle Watch, Owens addressed why the incident wasn’t featured in the latest episode.

“Because there is a disciplinary process going ahead, we then don’t comment so that we don’t interfere in that process, to be fair to everybody involved,” Owens explained.

Episodes of Whistle Watch are filmed on Tuesdays and uploaded later in the week, meaning the Beirne hearing result wasn’t known when the show was recorded.

A change in approach?

This could signal a shift in policy from World Rugby. In the past, Owens has openly discussed similar red card incidents – including those involving Romain Ntamack and Garry Ringrose – before their disciplinary outcomes were finalised.

Whether this marks a new direction for the governing body remains to be seen, but it’s clear that World Rugby is taking a more cautious approach when active disciplinary matters are involved following past complaints that Owens opinions could influence outcomes.

“Orange card & caterpillar ruck” – Five more law changes for the 2026 Six Nations

With the 2026 Six Nations creeping ever closer, talk is already turning to tweaks and transformations that could shake up the tournament.

France have been leading the charge with bold refereeing innovations — so maybe it’s time the rest of Europe took note.

Here are five law changes we think would make next year’s Championship faster, fairer, and a whole lot more fun.

Join RUCK’s Instagram broadcast channel and get the latest rugby news straight to your phone.

1. Bring in the Orange Card

French rugby has gone rogue — and fans are loving it.

This season, referees in France have introduced the orange card, signalling a 20-minute red and ditching the bunker review system altogether. Decisions stay on the pitch, in the hands of the referee — where they belong.

“It is easier for the fans to understand what is going on,” said Head of French Refereeing Mathieu Raynal. “With orange, everyone knows it means 20 minutes off the field. The referee decides — not the bunker.”

It’s simple, visible, and keeps supporters in the loop. Instead of long delays and confusion, fans get instant clarity. The orange card offers a middle ground between yellow and red — serious enough to punish foul play but not game-killing for borderline offences.

It’s fair. It’s fast. It’s fan-friendly. Bring it to the Six Nations.

2. Straight Scrum Feeds – No More Cheating at the Set Piece

France have also taken on another sacred cow: the crooked scrum feed.

Gone are the days of the scrum-half rolling it straight into the second row. Referees now demand a square feed

Raynal isn’t backing down:

“Ninety per cent of feeds last season were not straight. We want more equity. Some think we’re crazy, but we will continue. It’s about the good of the game.”

The result? Scrums are once again a fair fight, with the potential for turnovers and genuine battles up front. It might look messy at first, but that’s what real competition looks like.

Time for the Six Nations to follow suit.

3. No More Draws — Golden Point for a Decisive Finish

After 80 minutes of bone-on-bone intensity, no one wants to walk away with a draw.

It’s time to bring in the golden point — where the first score in extra time wins. Simple. Dramatic. Decisive.

It would push teams to play positive rugby, going for tries and drop goals rather than settling for safety. Every possession would matter. Every mistake would sting.

A quick extra period — two five-minute halves or a first-score-wins setup — would keep players safe while giving fans the thrilling finishes they crave.

No more anticlimactic stalemates. Just winners, losers, and unforgettable endings.

4. Fewer Substitutions, More Stamina

Rugby’s bench revolution has gone too far. With 6–2 or even 7–1 splits, the game’s turning into a power contest instead of a skill showcase.

Big men off the bench change the tone completely — fresh legs smashing into exhausted defenders, making the final quarter less about finesse and more about fatigue management.

Cutting substitutions would reward endurance, intelligence, and in-game adaptability. Tired players make for open spaces and attacking flair — not endless pick-and-go sequences.

It’s a move that could restore rugby’s balance between brains and brawn.

5. Scrap the Caterpillar Ruck

Let’s be honest — the caterpillar ruck is killing the vibe.

That slow, snaking queue behind the ruck just to give the nine a perfect box-kick platform? It’s dull, predictable, and completely out of step with the modern fan’s appetite for pace and excitement.

Yes, it’s clever. But it’s not entertaining.

Referees calling “use it” earlier has helped, but the only real fix is to ban the tactic outright. Speed up the breakdown, bring back contestability, and let rugby breathe again.

The Six Nations should be about tempo, tension, and theatre — not tactical time-wasting.

Springbok star Eben Etzebeth open to shock short-term move

Springboks team to face France in Autumn Series - Siya Kolisi to make 100th cap for South Africa