England’s 2026 Six Nations campaign proved deeply underwhelming, with the side managing just one win from five matches.
⭐ Save us to your Google Favourites for nonstop RUCK content!
The tournament exposed significant issues in cohesion, selection, and attacking identity, leaving head coach and players under growing scrutiny.
In its post-tournament review, The Telegraph highlighted five England players who struggled to make a meaningful impact, handing out some of the lowest ratings in the squad.
While harsh, the assessments reflect a campaign where very little went to plan.
Fraser Dingwall – A Reliable Presence Without Cutting Edge
Telegraph rating: 4/10
“We know how much he is valued internally for his leadership skills, but lacks either the size or speed to make much of an imprint. Which other Test teams would he start at 12 for?”
RUCK verdict:
Dingwall provided structure and dependability at inside centre, often acting as an additional distributor in England’s backline. However, the attack frequently lacked tempo and punch with him in midfield. He rarely threatened the gainline consistently, though this may say as much about England’s tactical setup as his individual limitations.
Ollie Lawrence – Targeted and Limited
Telegraph rating: 4/10
“One appearance against Ireland who seemed to target his defensive channel. Curiously England said he picked up a knee injury but started for Bath in a friendly on Friday night.”
RUCK verdict:
Lawrence featured only once, against Ireland, where he appeared to be singled out defensively. His overall contribution was tidy but subdued, with few opportunities to influence the game. A lack of minutes ultimately prevented him from making a stronger case.
