Former referee Owen Doyle has admitted that a key decision in the France vs England match was incorrect, backing criticism from England head coach Steve Borthwick.
Borthwick had strongly opposed the awarding of a penalty try to France, and Doyle agrees there was a crucial error in the build-up.
Doyle explained that the match turned on two major moments, the first being the penalty try awarded by Georgian referee Nika Amashukeli.
“The result hinged on two events. The first one saw the Georgian referee, Nika Amashukeli, award France a penalty try and send Ellis Genge to the sin-bin for collapsing the French attacking maul. In isolation, that was the correct decision.” he wrote in his column for The Irish Times.
However, Doyle believes the officials missed an earlier infringement:
“There is a broader picture. It shows the French jumper being shielded by team-mates as he lands and the maul starts to move forward. That, for me, was the first offence — a penalty to England for obstruction was due.”
He also questioned the role of the TMO, Brett Conran, in the decision-making process:
“It is tricky enough to see at ground level, while the TMO has a bird’s eye view, but, on this occasion, Brett Conran did not seem to offer any concrete advice.”
“Double Whammy” Debate
Doyle acknowledged ongoing debate around awarding both a penalty try and a yellow card:
“There is a school of thought that a penalty try accompanied by a yellow card is a double whammy, and unnecessarily harsh. But it exists to stop players attempting to get away with an infringement, knowing that the bin awaits if they are caught.”
He added:
“Steve Borthwick was distinctly unamused on this one, and he has a point.”
Confusion Over Advantage Call
A second controversial moment involved a change in advantage, highlighted by England captain Maro Itoje.
“There was also confusion for England when a penalty advantage was changed to a knock-on advantage (apparently called during the play by the TMO), prior to France breaking out for Louis Bielle-Biarrey’s fourth try.”
Doyle questioned whether this aligned with officiating protocol:
“An explanation is needed as to how that fits the TMO protocol.”
Overall Refereeing Performance
Despite the controversy, Doyle still praised the referee’s overall performance:
“Apart from these two uncharacteristic incidents the referee was good, in a match with the highest degree of difficulty and intensity. Very few officials could have handled matters equally well.”
Mail Online brutally ranks England’s FIVE worst performers in the Six Nations
red plenty of scrutiny as performances fluctuated throughout the tournament.
Following the championship, Mail Online released its player ratings, with only five England players receiving a score below 5/10.
Several of those low ratings were influenced by injuries, limited appearances, or difficult matches against strong opposition. Below is a closer look at those players — alongside RUCK’s own verdict on their tournaments.
Mail Online: "Played very well on last summer’s Lions tour despite nursing a serious wrist injury. It all caught up with him in this year’s championship. Nowhere near his best, in and out of the side, and then suffered a calf problem in the warm-up to the Italy game. Like Itoje, he also badly, badly needs a rest."
RUCK Verdict: Curry was injured against Italy and otherwise produced a fairly average tournament by his usual high standards. Fitness issues clearly impacted his ability to influence games consistently.
Ollie Lawrence – 3/10
Mail Online: "Struggles with a knee injury meant that his only appearance came against Ireland and England were cut to ribbons defensively in the outside channels in that game. He’s far better than he showed in this championship."
RUCK Verdict: Lawrence appeared only against Ireland. He played tidily but had limited opportunity to make a larger impact on the game.
Luke Cowan-Dickie – 3/10
Mail Online: "Replaced after just 29 minutes against Ireland as he couldn’t find a lineout jumper with his throws for love nor money, but he’s the type of character to brush off setbacks. The reality is England don’t have better hooking options than him and George right now, even if Theo Dan must surely come through at some point."
RUCK Verdict: Cowan-Dickie endured a difficult afternoon against Ireland where England’s lineout malfunctioned early. However, his overall contribution and experience still make him an important part of England’s current hooking options.
Fraser Dingwall – 4/10
Mail Online: "The Northampton man had enjoyed a good autumn and deserved to start the campaign as England's No 12.
But Borthwick will finish the tournament with question marks over who should be wearing the shirt. Dingwall is another one who disappeared after Ireland and may struggle to retain his place amid competition from Seb Atkinson and Max Ojomoh."
RUCK Verdict: Dingwall offers distribution as an additional playmaker in midfield but rarely threatens the gainline consistently. This reflects England’s tactical setup as much as it does individual performance.
Freddie Steward – 4/10
Mail Online: "Started the tournament but like others, he paid the price for the Scotland and Ireland defeats and was nowhere to be seen in the final two rounds. Substituted before half-time against the Irish as England began woefully again. It was bizarre that George Furbank didn’t get a minute at full-back, as he has to be first choice in that position."
RUCK Verdict: Steward endured one of the tournament’s lowest moments against Ireland, receiving a red card and leaving the field after 30 minutes. While it was a difficult outing, the incident highlighted areas for improvement rather than making him a scapegoat for England’s struggles.
Ellis Genge is sent to the sin bin 🟨
England will be down to 14 men for the first 10 minutes of the second half after Genge was penalised for collapsing a maul close to the tryline ❌